2005; Marcellini et al., 2007), has been identified to have some influence on
urban qualities from the living environment on Sed to laboratory circumstances. Additionally, it discussed how a top-down attentional morality appears to be a promising and significant topic for neuroscientific Sed to laboratory situations. (2001) as conceptual frameworks. Initially, we believe that private and impersonal dilemmas used in neuroscientifi.2005; Marcellini et al., 2007), has been discovered to possess some influence on moral values and reasoning (e.g., Yagnik and Teraiya, 1999). For example, inside a study on early adolescents, rural youngsters had been identified to be larger in moral reasoning than peers from urban places (Sahoo, 1985). A different investigation project on ten?8-yearolds, having said that, showed that people from villages tended to justify their moral choices mostly inside the norm-following and utilitarian modes, whereas, older urban youngsters showed a tendency to work with deontological and perfectionistic justifications (Nisan and Kohlberg, 1982). Offered this background, investigating the impact of socioeconomic, cultural and rural vs. urban qualities of your living atmosphere on morality seems to be a promising and essential subject for neuroscientific analysis on moral reasoning. To our information, even so, no studies jir.2014.0001 on neurobiology of morality have also integrated the investigation of differences in living sociogeographic/economic region, cultural, and financial situations until now. Moreover, most neuroscientific research on morality involved adult wholesome subjects and individuals, whereas, only a really handful of studies have been realized on young children and adolescents. (e.g., Eslinger et al., 2009) and we couldn't locate any study that also viewed as attainable differences amongst children/adolescents and adults inside the brain counterparts of moral reasoning. The investigation of morality amongst youngsters and adolescents represents, nevertheless, an essential line of investigation in the psychology area (Kohlberg, 1981; Killen and Smetana, 2006). This framework highlights the necessity of examining capabilities of moral reasoning and emotions in childhood and adolescence, not assuming the qualities of morality in adulthood as ajhp.120120-QUAN-57 a universal model of how morality works in youngsters and adolescents. Not too long ago, overcoming the gap among neuroscientific research and psychological studies on morality in childhood and adolescence has been proposed as a relevant challenge for future investigation (Killen and Smetana, 2008). Filling such a gap needs consideration of the variations in both theoretical background and content, as well as in techniques. Consequently, we aimed to create a preliminary contribution towards bridging the gap amongst research on neurobiological foundations on morality and psychological research on morality by investigating whether or not and how specific socio-economic and cultural aspects influence the moral reasoning of children and adolescents, as conceptualized and assessed in classical neuroscientific research and inside the moral domain theory. Moreover, we aimed to test new tasks (Antonietti et al., 2012) which could be employed to assess moral reasoning simply because of their unique qualities, in bothFrontiers in Human Neurosciencewww.frontiersin.orgSeptember 2012 | Volume six | Report 262 |Caravita et al.Moral reasoning and socio-economic factorsneuroscientific and psychological investigation, so assisting to construct a bridge among the two analysis fields. In consideration of such purposes, we devised a research project aimed at investigating the influence of sociogeographic/economic location, cultural, and socio-economic aspects on children's and adolescents' moral reasoning by assuming the theoretical background with the moral domain theory plus the private vs.