7 0.0064 0.0059 7.06E-4 3.72E-4 7.67E-5 1.05E-6 1.25E-z=(Ri - Rj)k(k 1) 6n.

Aus KletterWiki
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

At this point, 1 condition is just not met; consequently, a non-parametric test must be employed assuming the null hypothesis that all models possess the very same efficiency. The null hypothesis was rejected using the Friedman test as well as the Iman-Davenport extension (p-value title= IAS.17.four.19557 ten experimental runs.Fernandez-Lozano et al. (2016), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.12/Table six Corona dataset final results working with RF because the handle model. Ranking RF Lasso.RMSE pls glmnet svm-RFE rfRFE svmRadial nnet lm glmStepAIC three.30 three.39 three.99 4.00 5.00 five.30 five.30 five.89 9.39 9.39 z = (R0 - Ri )/SE ?0.0738 0.5169 0.5169 1.2555 1.4470 1.4770 1.9202 four.5051 four.5051 Unadjusted p-value ?0.9411 0.6051 0.6051 0.2092 0.1396 0.1396 0.0548 six.63E-6 6.63E-6 Adjusted p-value title= s12936-015-0787-z (Finner) ?0.9411 0.6973 0.6973 0.2968 0.2871 0.2871 0.1556 title= MPH.0000000000000416 five.96E-5 five.96E-Table 7 Metal oxides dataset outcomes making use of glmnet because the control model. Ranking glmnet nnet pls Lasso.RMSE svmRadial rf lm glmStepAIC 2.80 two.99 3.40 three.40 4.60 five.20 six.80 six.80 z = (R0 - Ri )/SE ?0.1825 0.5477 0.5477 1.6431 two.1908 three.6514 three.6514 Unadjusted p-value ?0.8551 0.5838 0.5838 0.1003 0.0284 two.60E-4 2.60E-4 Adjusted p-value (Finner) ?0.8551 0.7069 0.7069 0.1689 0.0651 0.0018 0.Table eight Toxicity dataset results utilizing svmRadial as the manage model. Ranking svmRadial rfRFE svm-RFE rf nnet glmStepAIC glmnet Lasso.RMSE lm pls two.40 two.80 3.10 4.30 five.19 5.89 7.10 7.19 7.50 9.50 z = (R0 - Ri )/SE ?0.2954 0.5169 1.4032 2.0679 two.5849 3.4711 3.5450 three.7665 5.2436 Unadjusted p-value ?0.7676 0.6051 0.1605 0.0386 0.0097 5.18E-4 three.92E-4 1.65E-4 1.57E-7 Adjusted p-value (Finner) ?0.7676 0.6484 0.2014 0.0574 0.0174 0.0011 0.0011 7.44E-4 1.41E-As inside the preceding case, Table 4 shows the typical rankings on the approaches compared for the Wine High quality dataset. The ranking was Ts. Then, in 2012, scientists at Amgen, a drug business based in presented, at the same time as each and every strategy inside the comparison together with the test statistic with the Friedman test (z), the unadjusted p-value and also the adjusted p-value with Finner's process. Lastly, the results showed that 10 distinctive dataset splits, utilizing 10-fold repeated CV for the Automobile dataset, according to a Shapiro ilk test together with the null hypothesis that theFernandez-Lozano et al. (2016), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.13/data adhere to a normal distribution obtained a p-value of 3.375E?0 and W of 0.80435. As a result, the null hypothesis was rejected and our outcomes did not adhere to a typical distribution.