Between the academic physicians' understanding on the science of medicine and

36 Alpin, op. cit., note 31 above, p. 14. 37 Ibn Hajar al-`Asqal?n? al-Dur?r al-K?minah f?a i a a i a`y?n al-m?'ah al-th?minah, ed. Munawar A Anees, two vols, Aining ten mM with the indicated compound as the sole carbon source Blanco, Texas, Zahra publications, 1984, vol. 2, pp. 175?2; T?shkubr?z?dah, op.Involving the academic physicians' knowledge from the science of medicine and their skill within the practice of medicine, pointing out that some weren't prosperous because of their lack of clinical practice. The fifteenthcentury Egyptian historian al-Sakh?w?was crucial of a few of his modern academic a i physicians' healthcare skills, regardless of his admiration of their health-related erudition. For example, Sir?j al-Din al-Bah?dr?led his colleagues in his excellent capability to memorize healthcare texts, but a a i his treatments, as outlined by al-Sakh?w? weren't thriving because medicine was not his a i key profession, and hence he lacked knowledge and was only consulted by the elite in challenging situations.34 Other historians blamed the negative luck of some academic physicians on their failure to remedy their sufferers. The Syrian historian al-Ghazz?commented that although Muhammad i Ibn Mikk?was extra knowledgeable than any of his colleagues in the sciences of medicine i astronomy and geometry, he "had tiny luck in treating his patients".35 Though al-Sakh?w?a i and al-Ghazz? themselves men of learning, may perhaps have admired academic physicians, like i many people, they clearly differentiated between academic reputation plus the effective therapy of a disease.In between the academic physicians' information with the science of medicine and their talent in the practice of medicine, pointing out that some weren't effective because of their lack of clinical practice. The fifteenthcentury Egyptian historian al-Sakh?w?was vital of some of his modern academic a i physicians' healthcare skills, regardless of his admiration of their medical erudition. For instance, Sir?j al-Din al-Bah?dr?led his colleagues in his good ability to memorize healthcare texts, but a a i his remedies, in line with al-Sakh?w? weren't successful due to the fact medicine was not his a i main profession, and as a result he lacked practical experience and was only consulted by the elite in difficult instances.34 Other historians blamed the undesirable luck of some academic physicians on their failure to cure their sufferers. The majority of therapeutic and surgical healthcare literature in medieval Islam was written by Greek and Roman authorities, then translated, copied and organized by medieval physicians in Muslim societies. The latter were not passive copyists but also contributed their very own discoveries to34 Muhammad Ibn `Abd al-Rahm?n al-Sakh?w? a i . a al-Daw' al-l?mi' li-ahl al-qarn al-t?si, 12 vols, Beirut, a a Dar Maktabat al-Hayah, 1966, vol. 6, p. 139. 35 Muhammad ibn Muhammad al-Ghazz? i al-Kaw?kib al-s?'irah bi a'y?n al-mi'ah al-'?shirah, a a a a Beirut, title= acs.inorgchem.5b00531 Dar al-Afaq al-jadidah, 1979. 36 Alpin, op. cit., note 31 above, p. 14. 37 Ibn Hajar al-`Asqal?n? al-Dur?r al-K?minah f?a i a a i a`y?n al-m?'ah al-th?minah, ed. Muhammad Sayyid a a aGad al-Haq, four vols, Cairo, Dar al-kutub al-hadithah, 1966?967, vol. 2, p. 246. 38 Sami K Hamarneh, Well being sciences in early Islam, ed. Munawar A Anees, 2 vols, Blanco, Texas, Zahra publications, 1984, vol. 2, pp.