Care unit. Competing interests Authors declared of getting no potential conflict

The Italian method for patient safety. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404:12?. four. Lo Scalzo A, Donatini A, Orzella L, Cicchetti A, Profili S, Maresso A. Italy: Health system assessment. Well being Syst Transit. 2009;11(six)1-216, p.36. 5. Sorra J, Dyer N. Multilevel psychometric properties with the AHRQ hospital survey on patient safety culture. BMC Wellness Serv Res. 2010;10:199. 6. European Society for Excellent in Healthcare. Use of Patient Security Culture Instruments and Suggestions. Aarhus, Denmark; 2010. http:// ns208606.ovh.net/ extranet/images/EUNetPaS_Publications/eunetpas-reportuse-of-psci-andrecommandations-april-8-2010.pdf. Accessed 22 Jul 2015. 7. Nieva VF, Sorra J. Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations. BMJQS. 2003;12:i17?3. 8. Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Es [125?27, have a tendency to address systemic barriers, like restricted time consultations] Neilands TB, Rowan K, Vella K, Boyden J, et al. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking information, and emerging research. BMC Wellness Serv Res. 2006;6:44. 9. Deilk ET, Hofoss D. Psychometric properties with the Norwegian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Generic version (Short Form 2006). BMC Wellness Serv Res. 2008;8:191. ten. Kaya S, Barsbay S, Karabulut E. The Turkish version in the safety attitudes questionnaire: psychometric properties and baseline data. Qual Saf Wellness Care. 2010;19:572?. 11. Devriendt E, Van den Heede K, Coussement J, Dejaeger E,.Care unit. Competing interests Authors declared of possessing no prospective conflict of interest using the present work. Authors' contributions GN conceived the study, performed evaluation and prepared the manuscript. NG conceived the study and performed information analysis. DP and SAI conceived the study, prepared the questionnaire and participated in collection and assembly the information. All authors read and approved the final manuscripts. Acknowledgments We thank Professor Gabriele Romano, Ms. Nadia Carolina Oprandi, Professor Mauro Niero, Professor Aldo Polettini, Professor Stefano Tardivo, Professor Giuseppe Verlato at the University of Verona, Ms. Francessca Morreti, Ms. Tessari Lorella, and Ms. Ugola Federica in the G. Fracastoro hospital for their assistance throughout this work. We also thank Professor Professor Eric Thomas (The University of Texas Center of Excellence for Patient Security Analysis and Practice, The University of Texas ouston Health-related School, Houston, USA), Dr. Wui-Chiang Lee title= jir.2011.0094 (Division of Health-related Affairs and Arranging, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and Institute of title= j.neuron.2016.04.018 Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan) and Dr. Barbara Hoffmann (Institute for Basic Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University) for their advices. Author facts 1 Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health and Neighborhood Medicine, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie 8, Verona 37134, Italy. 2New hospitals LTD, Tbilisi, Georgia. 3Ruby Med Plus, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. 4Girolamo Fracastoro hospital, San Bonifacio, Verona, Italy.Nguyen et al. BMC Well being Solutions Research (2015) 15:Page eight ofReceived: 28 August 2014 Accepted: 14 JulyReferences 1. European Opinion Study Group. Patient Security and Good quality of Healthcare. Brussels; 2010(October 2009). two. Zwart D, Langelaan M, van de Vooren R, Kuyvenhoven M, Kalkman C, Verheij T, et al. Patient security culture measurement generally practice. Clinimetric properties of "SCOPE". BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:117. 3. Ghirardini A, Murolo G, Palumbo F. The Italian method for patient security.