Could get a bicycle or walk', P14). Behaviour frequency 9 context stability

I'd say neither agree nor disagree. Now that I am living on my own, I do not do that frequently, but when I'm ... back home, I do it much more regularly `cause I know there'll be a lot of chips and cookies around. (P9)Sources of bias and error Self-presentation. All four segments (two.7 ; 4 participants) coded into this category arose from SRHI items relating to `drinking alcohol', Properly students use representations (interpretation) compared using a scientist in a reflecting concerns that agreement with statements about habitual drinking would portray participants within a negative light (e.g., `would I sound like an alcoholic if I mentioned "agree"?'; title= fpsyg.2014.00822 P3).A think-aloud study of self-report habit measuresRecall error. This category (13 title= fpsyg.2016.00083 responses [8.9 ]; 10 participants) captured difficulties participants knowledgeable in accurately recalling their behaviour (11 responses) or cues (two), one example is:`On how many from the past 7 days did you consume unhealthy snacks?' I don't know, I cannot count, so let's say 3 or four days, I don't know.Could get a bicycle or walk', P14). Behaviour frequency 9 context stability cue products, that are made to capture the contexts in which a habitual action commences, evoked most misinterpretations for commuting. Participants variously interpreted `commuting' to start when leaving household, when waiting for a bus or train, or when aboard the car:Benjamin Gardner and Vinca Tang [I am within the same physical location] virtually generally, if it's from household. (P9)Contextual qualification was observed across all behaviours, even for products relating to drinking a second alcoholic drink, which explicitly specified location and preceding action cues:`Drinking a second alcoholic drink ... is something I would locate hard not to do'. A little, I guess, yes, when absolutely everyone else is drinking. (P6)Some participants gave neutral responses to items deemed insufficiently contextualized, regardless of indicating that they (dis)agreed with statements in specific settings. For instance, a participant going to the UK stated:`Eating unhealthy snacks is some thing I do frequently'. I'd say neither agree nor disagree. Now that I am living on my own, I do not do that frequently, but when I'm ... back home, I do it a lot more frequently `cause I know there'll be a great deal of chips and cookies around. (P9)Sources of bias and error Self-presentation. All 4 segments (two.7 ; 4 participants) coded into this category arose from SRHI things relating to `drinking alcohol', reflecting concerns that agreement with statements about habitual drinking would portray participants inside a damaging light (e.g., `would I sound like an alcoholic if I stated "agree"?'; title= fpsyg.2014.00822 P3).A think-aloud study of self-report habit measuresRecall error. This category (13 title= fpsyg.2016.00083 responses [8.9 ]; ten participants) captured difficulties participants experienced in accurately recalling their behaviour (11 responses) or cues (two), by way of example:`On how numerous in the previous 7 days did you consume unhealthy snacks?' I never know, I cannot count, so let's say three or four days, I don't know. (P17) `When I eat unhealthy snacks, I am in the exact same physical location'. I do not keep in mind where I eat unhealthy snacks. (P13)DiscussionThis study utilized `think-aloud' techniques to investigate potential dif.