Ent and Analytic StrategyThe initial step was to enter data into

Each scale was assessed by 50 KF-89617 manufacturer participants (25 females). Only questionnaires from participants who had fulfilled the criteria of responding within 1 week and who did not report any abnormalities in the course of their work had been included. Then descriptive statistics [number of assessments (N), Imply (M), Standard Deviation (SD), Range (Min and Max values)] had been calculated for every single word, separately for each and every from the 8 scales. All analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS 22 statistical software. The Supplemental Material (Appendix 1) incorporates all values for valence, arousal, dominance, origin, significance, concreteness, imageability, and subjective age of acquisition assessments. Each and every word was rated by 400 participants. Every single scale was assessed by 50 participants (25 females). Participants had been instructed to leaveFrontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.orgJuly 2016 | Volume 7 | ArticleImbirAffective Norms for Polish WordsTABLE two | Summary of variables incorporated in the word list with means (M), standard deviations (SD) and ranges for all participants. Affective ratings M Valence Arousal Dominance Origin Significance Concreteness Imageability Age of Acqisition LN Frequency (Subtlex_pl) ?LN Frequency, (Kazojc, 2011) Variety of letters 5.01 4.08 five.12 5.44 3.83 4.13 6.29 9.13 5.75 5.93 7.61 SD 1.29 0.86 1.00 0.83 0.86 1.65 1.21 1.74 2.35 2.33 2.83 Range 1.44?.40 two.06?.18 two.04?.10 two.28?.78 1.86?.02 1.44?.72 two.53?.48 3.62?four.06 1.10?five.16 0.69?four.72 2?2 M 49.71 49.77 49.70 49.74 49.84 49.63 49.55 49.78 Number of collected ratings SD 1.86 1.35 1.87 1.56 1.13 2.13 2.56 1.51 Range 16?0 26?0 16?0 26?0 21?0 14?0 ten?0 21?that neutral / moderate stimuli are in fact far more incongruent in assessments. This isn't surprising, taking into account that a word can get an intense imply value only when the majority of the assessments are as intense as imply itself is, thus intense stimuli are far more congruent than moderate ones. Surprisingly, inside the case of valence, the relation is "U" shaped, not reverse "U" shaped. There is a group of neutral stimuli that had been pretty low in SDvalues (c.f. Figure three). A equivalent pattern was found within the case of an Italian adaptation of ANEW (Montefinese et al., 2014).In all instances ANOVA analysis showed no substantial differences between the first and second assessment of 15 repeated words for valence: F (1, 49) = 1.36, p = 0.25, two = 0.027; arousal: F (1, title= journal.pcbi.0010057 48) = 1.45, p = 0.23, 2 = 0.029; dominance: F (1, 49) = 0.06, p = 0.81, 2 = 0.001; origin: F (1, 49) = 0.48, p = 0.5, 2 = 0.01; significance: F (1, 48) = 0 2.1, p = 0.15, title= JVI.00652-15 2 = 0.042; concreteness: title= JCM.01607-14 F (1, 49) = 1.41, p = 0.24, two = 0.029; imageability: F (1, 49) = 0.27, p = 0.6, two = 0.006; or the subjective age of acquisition: F (1, 49) = 0.44, p = 0.five, 2 = 0.009.Reliability of MeasurementTo measure reliability two kinds of estimations have been applied.