-6000 -10000 2000 4000 6000 x/mm (c) Fault model:three, score=0.3957 5000 -8000 -5000 0 5000 x

Aus KletterWiki
Version vom 28. März 2018, 15:37 Uhr von Router65space (Diskussion | Beiträge)

(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)

Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

Mutant IDH1-IN-2 side effects Considering the fact that none from the models offered by the system can govern the situation, the weights of all 4 models are insignificant. Robust dead reckoning result for case 3b (time step 13).(a)RDR[284.25,27.15,0.10], score=0.5904 (b)DR[125.28,12.05,0.10], score=0.0955 5000y/mm-y/mm---10000 1000 2000 3000 0 1000 2000 3000 x/mm x/mm (c)PSM[144.82,-1.08,0.17], score=0.1224 (D)ICP[281.97,-311.28,0.09], score=0.3552 5000 5000y/mm-y/mm--1000 2000 x/mm-1000 2000 x/mmFigure 21. Case 4a:Gyroscope stuck, fault model = four (time Step 16).(a) Fault model:1, score=0.0610 6000 4000 y/mm y/mm 2000 0 -2000 -4000 -5000 5000 10000 x/mm (c) Fault model:three, score=0.0285 6000 4000 y/mm y/mm 2000 0 -2000 -4000 -5000 0 5000 x/mm 10000 0 (b) Fault model:two, score=0.0265 6000 4000 2000 0 -2000 -4000 2000 4000 6000 x/mm (d) Fault model:4, score=0.0940 6000 4000 2000 0 -2000 -4000 -5000 0 x/mm 5000Sensors 2014, 14 Figure 22. Case 4b: Gyroscope stuck, fault model = 4 (time Step 17).(a) Fault model:1, score=0.0394 4000 (b) Fault model:2, score=0.0452y/mmy/mm-2000 4000 6000 x/mm (c) Fault model:three, score=0.0450-2000 4000 6000 x/mm (d) Fault model:4, title= j.1399-3046.2011.01563.x score=0.1238y/mmy/mm-2000 -5000 x/mm-2000 -5000 x/mmFigure 23. Robust dead reckoning result for Case 4a (time Step 16).(a)RDR[-0.21,-0.05,0.24], score=0.0950 (b)DR[-0.21,-0.00,0.00], score=0.0610 6000 6000 4000 y/mm y/mm 2000 0 -2000 -4000 -5000 4000 2000 0 --4000 0 5000 -5000 0 5000 10000 x/mm x/mm (c)PSM[1.36,-3.39,0.06], score=0.0922 (D)ICP[-8.26,48.21,0.27], score=0.6516 6000 6000 4000 4000 y/mm 2000 0 -2000 0 5000 x/mm 10000 -4000 -5000 0 x/mmy/mm2000 0 -2000 -4000 -Sensors 2014, 14 Figure 24. Robust dead reckoning result for Case 4b (time Step 17).(a)RDR[0.45,0.11,0.23], score=0.1259 4000 (b)DR[0.46,0.00,0.00], score=0.0394y/mmy/mm-2000 5000 10000 0 2000 4000 6000 x/mm x/mm (c)PSM[-10.59,-10.71,0.29], score=0.1967(D)ICP[18.85,48.32,0.28], score=0.6150 4000 4000-2000 -y/mmy/mm-2000 -5000 x/mm-2000 -5000 x/mm6.five. Diagnosability There are three typical situations which are challenging to diagnose. The initial is that the kinematics of distinctive models has a related performance. The second would be the that real state has not been modeled in the system. The third is the fact that the readings in the external sensors are seriously broken. Figure 25 shows the case of `no faults'; in this case, every Z-Ile-Glu-Pro-Phe-Ome msds single model is right, due to the fact of redundancy title= 2229-5151.84803 involving the gyroscope and encoders.