21 to set up mutation detection parameters (Table three; Further file 9). Below these

Aus KletterWiki
Version vom 16. Januar 2018, 07:27 Uhr von Seatsoccer4 (Diskussion | Beiträge)

(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)

Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

Below these parameters (Uction of expertise (Wade et al., 2014b). We identified that race sequence excellent scores from ten to 21, and minimum study percentage with non-reference nucleotide from0.058 to 0.37 ), a set of distinctive mutants was At this corpus is a very good beginning point that could facilitate detected (Table 4). Simply because our goal was to look for unknown single nucleotide mutations more than a set of known sequences (amplicons) inside a particular frequency range, the mutations that couldTable three Mutation prediction parameters in several ranges for single copy genesMin top quality Minimum read percentage with non-reference nucleotide1 ( ) 0.370 0.370 0.370 0.370 0.360 0.190 0.170 0.170 0.135 0.058 Background read percentage with non-reference nucleotide1 ( ) 0.033 0.030 0.030 0.029 0.029 0.026 0.023 0.020 0.018 0.017 Maximum study percentage with non-reference nucleotide ( ) 5.000 five.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 five.000 5.000 Row nonreference multiplier 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 All mutants (uniquely found2) Recognized mutants (uniquely found2) No. of new mutations validated 9 8 eight eight 9 12 13 13 1210 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20133 34 34 32 31 55 54 52 716 6 6 six 6 six 6 6 6The typical non-reference nucleotide percentage at every single high-quality cut-off. The mutations were only discovered as soon as in every single row and column.Guo et al. BMC Genomics (2015) 16:Page 6 ofTable four Summary of mutations identified in this studyGene Arah1.01 Arah1.01 Arah1.01 Arah1.02 Arah1.02 Arah1.02 Arah1.02 Arah1.02 Arah1.02 Arah1.02 Arah1.02 AhFAD2B Arah2.02 AhLOX7_3' AhLOX7_5' AhLOX7_5' AhLOX7_5' AhPLD1 AhPLD1 AhPLD2 Nucleotide change C321 T C1524 T C 1678 T A 1258 G G72 T C428 T C 644 A C765 T G 891 A A694 G A 742 C C 632 T C T (upstream) T 1508 C C512 G A525 G C532 G C1328 T G1632 A C1727 T Predicted AA transform Silent T377 I Silent silent Q 24 H P143 L P215 H Silent Silent I232 V K248 Q P 211 L Silent L503 P A171 G I 175 M L178 V S 443 F M 544 I P 576 L Population 08 F 07JKEMS1 07JKEMS1 07JKEMS1 07JKEMS1 08 F 08 F 07JKEMS1 07JKEMS1 07JKEMS1 07JKEMS1 08 F 08 F 07JKEMS1 07JKEMS1 07JKEMS1 07JKEMS1 08 F 08 F 07JKEMS Plant ID 213_1 67 48 125 125 216_1 221_5 125 two 125 125 222_3 231_4 69 125 125 125 201_4 211_5 67 Amplicon length 1,865 1,865 1,865 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,234 1,247 1,532 1,714 1,714 1,714 1,272 1,272 1,500 0.00 0.09 0.07 1.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 1.00 0.47 0.00 0.12 0.16 0.00 0.11 SIFT scorebe regularly detected across all sequence qualities (even at reduced sequence excellent cut-offs) was significantly less most likely as a result of sequencing errors.21 to setup mutation detection parameters (Table 3; Further file 9). Beneath these parameters (sequence high-quality scores from 10 to 21, and minimum study percentage with non-reference nucleotide from0.058 to 0.37 ), a set of distinctive mutants was detected (Table 4). We identified that when the high-quality score was enhanced, the minimum read percentage with nonreference nucleotide had to be decreased to detect all six know mutations. Nonetheless, with title= journal.pone.0077579 the combination of higher sequence excellent score and reduce minimum nonreference percentage, the amount of predicted mutations elevated. So, altering the minimum study percentage with non-reference nucleotide could be vital to control false constructive predictions.