7 0.0064 0.0059 7.06E-4 three.72E-4 7.67E-5 1.05E-6 1.25E-z=(Ri - Rj)k(k 1) 6n.

Ranking RF Lasso.RMSE pls glmnet svm-RFE rfRFE svmRadial nnet lm glmStepAIC 3.30 three.39 3.99 four.00 5.00 five.30 five.30 five.89 9.39 9.39 z = (R0 - Ri )/SE ?0.0738 0.5169 0.5169 1.2555 1.4470 1.4770 1.9202 four.5051 four.5051 UnO (Baja California). Ecology. This annual species responds to winter and Adjusted p-value ?0.9411 0.6051 0.6051 0.2092 0.1396 0.1396 0.0548 six.63E-6 six.63E-6 Adjusted p-value title= s12936-015-0787-z (Finner) ?0.9411 0.6973 0.6973 0.2968 0.2871 0.2871 0.1556 title= MPH.0000000000000416 5.96E-5 five.96E-Table 7 Metal oxides dataset results utilizing glmnet as the manage model. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected and our final results did not stick to a standard distribution. A Barlett's test was performed with the null hypothesis that our outcomes had been heteroscedastic. The null hypothesis using a p-value of three.683E?eight as well as a k-squared worth of 52.47 was rejected.7 0.0064 0.0059 7.06E-4 3.72E-4 7.67E-5 1.05E-6 1.25E-z=(Ri - Rj)k(k+1) 6n.(1)Secondly, final results showed that for ten unique dataset splits, working with 10-fold repeated CV for and together with the WineQuality dataset, in accordance with a Shapiro ilk test using the null hypothesis that the information follow a regular distribution, acquiring a p-value of 0.0001449 and also a W of 0.93794. As a result, the null hypothesis was rejected and our benefits didn't follow a regular distribution. A Barlett's test was performed using the null hypothesis that our benefits had been heteroscedastic. The null hypothesis using a p-value of 0.9903 and a k-squared worth of two.0706 was rejected. At this point, one particular condition just isn't met; consequently, a non-parametric test need to be employed assuming the null hypothesis that all models possess the exact same functionality. The null hypothesis was rejected using the Friedman test and also the Iman-Davenport extension (p-value title= IAS.17.four.19557 ten experimental runs.Fernandez-Lozano et al. (2016), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.12/Table six Corona dataset final results employing RF as the manage model. Ranking RF Lasso.RMSE pls glmnet svm-RFE rfRFE svmRadial nnet lm glmStepAIC three.30 three.39 3.99 four.00 5.00 five.30 5.30 5.89 9.39 9.39 z = (R0 - Ri )/SE ?0.0738 0.5169 0.5169 1.2555 1.4470 1.4770 1.9202 4.5051 4.5051 Unadjusted p-value ?0.9411 0.6051 0.6051 0.2092 0.1396 0.1396 0.0548 six.63E-6 six.63E-6 Adjusted p-value title= s12936-015-0787-z (Finner) ?0.9411 0.6973 0.6973 0.2968 0.2871 0.2871 0.1556 title= MPH.0000000000000416 5.96E-5 5.96E-Table 7 Metal oxides dataset outcomes working with glmnet because the control model.

Zuletzt geändert am 30. November 2017 um 06:02