Ard sweep of processing (Hopf et al., 2009). By measuring the magnitude: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Version vom 22. Januar 2018, 21:42 Uhr

By measuring the magnitude of the effect of attention over title= srep30523 a wider variety of stimulus contrasts, in both event-related and mixed designs, two separate effects of attention had been Overt spatial attention: endogenous and exogenous William James described two various identified in regions V1 to V4: A rise in baseline activity, which is unlikely to improve functional discrimination, in addition to a contrast gain effect that could serve a functional function in stimulus processing (Li et al., 2008). However, the attentional gradient could also be on account of a feed-forward mechanism in which attentional modulation accumulates across sequential levels of processing. Whereas it has been established that endogenous (conceptually-driven) attention is mediated by a feedback mechanism (CorbettaNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptVision Res. Author manuscript; readily available in PMC 2012 July 05.CarrascoPageShulman, 2002; Desimone Duncan, 1995; Kanwisher Wojciulik, 2000; Kastner Ungerleider, 2000; Schroeder, Mehta, Foxe, 2001), a feed-forward mechanism seems a lot more likely within the case of transient (stimulus-driven) interest. The attentional effect increases along the hierarchy of visual locations, from V1 to V4. Due to the fact interest can boost the signal, its effect will be much more pronounced in extrastriate than striate regions.Ard sweep of processing (Hopf et al., 2009). By measuring the magnitude of your effect of consideration over title= srep30523 a wider variety of stimulus contrasts, in each event-related and mixed designs, two separate effects of attention were identified in areas V1 to V4: An increase in baseline activity, which is unlikely to enhance functional discrimination, and a contrast achieve impact that could serve a functional part in stimulus processing (Li et al., 2008). Rising the contrast get from the visual program shifts one of the most sensitive operating variety of the technique toward reduced contrasts, as a result improving the visual system's capacity to recognize these stimuli. The outcomes indicated that the magnitude on the attentional modulations was similar for all locations tested. The authors hypothesize that the differences with prior studies, in which attention's effect increased in higher cortical regions, could be due to the fact that they tested a wide range of stimulus contrasts whereas prior studies (e.g., Kastner et al., 1999; Maunsell Cook, 2002) had tested only a single, intermediate contrast. The authors stay agnostic regarding irrespective of whether feed-forward or feedback activity underlies the equivalent modulation across locations. Less is identified concerning the neural mechanism for exogenous interest and its effects on stimulus processing. Psychophysical findings demonstrating that exogenous focus increases contrast sensitivity recommend that it ought to also improve neural activity in early stages of visual processing. This hypothesis was tested by measuring brain activity in early visual areas applying fast event-related fMRI in conjunction using a peripheral cueing paradigm to manipulate exogenous consideration (Liu et al., 2005). Participants discriminated the orientation of certainly one of two gratings preceded or followed by a non-predictive peripheral cue. Precueing the target location improved performance and produced a bigger fMRI response in corresponding retinotopic areas. This enhancement progressively elevated from striate to extrastriate locations. Hence, exogenous focus increases both perceptual overall performance plus the concomitant stimulus-evoked activity in early visual regions. These final results deliver evidence relating to the retinotopically precise neural correlate for title= fpsyg.2016.01152 the effects of exogenous focus on early vision.