Was a `holistic' and `non-medical' questionnaire with a concentrate on social

Aus KletterWiki
Version vom 20. Dezember 2017, 10:11 Uhr von Search51class (Diskussion | Beiträge)

(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)

Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

They emphasised that the LWAQ dealt least nicely with symptomatology and that it was the Y asked about becoming inside a smoke-y restaurant, that does not questionnaire which was most reflective of your effect of asthma on QoL. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-Open AccessTable 1 Patients' point of view on content material missing in the questionnaires Questionnaire Missing content material AQLQ-S Cough Sex life Medication requirements Illustrative quote "(...) cough did not come up in that questionnaire. (...) Yes, yes because undoubtedly at the moment, err, my cough will be the main region in which I feel my life is restricted." (P8) "(...) the title= rstb.2014.0252 only one particular that it didn't have on there, which the other two did, was about sex life. I consider perhaps that need to have already been on there (...)" (P13) "Umm ... there was one questionnaire that talked about it really is a nuisance obtaining to take tablets--it can be a nuisance possessing to use your inhaler.Was a `holistic' and `non-medical' questionnaire having a concentrate on social and emotional aspects. Some participants said that the content coverage from the questionnaire was wide ranging and that it was a thorough, in-depth questionnaire. On the other hand, the LWAQ was described as irritating because it was felt to create complications with its emotional focus and its intrusive questioning. When comparing the diverse questionnaires, interviewees described the AQLQ-S as getting positioned in between the AQLQ-J and LWAQ because it was partly a `social' and partly a `medical' questionnaire. They emphasised that the LWAQ dealt least nicely with symptomatology and that it was the questionnaire which was most reflective of the influence of asthma on QoL. The AQLQ-S was thought of to become concise and `short and sweet'. In comparison using the AQLQ-S and the LWAQ, being able to decide on activity items was seen as an advantage in the AQLQ-J. Missing title= 2013/480630 content Participants identified several regions that they thought of missing from the questionnaires, title= nature12715 for example the will need to seek healthcare (medication, consultation or admission) for their asthma (table 1). Participants commented on a lack of content relating to asthma handle (like peak flow measurement), and noted their responses for the items would differ reflecting how well their asthma was controlled.Nicely I have to say, like I stated, the one point which is missing, would be the asthma management of a person, due to the fact that could have a bearing on top quality of life--if it truly is quite badly managed. (P15)Participants also lamented that allergies and asthma triggers weren't reflected in the questionnaires' content, thereby just about missing the incredibly nature of asthma as a fluctuating disease.(...) it was virtually like it is actually for someone who has got asthma just each of the time, you realize ... but my asthma mainly occurs when I come in get in touch with with animals or with tree pollen or the things that set me off, you see what I mean? (P11)Redundant or comparable content material All three questionnaires attracted comment about redundant content. As an example the AQLQ-S asks about frustration (item 9), anger (item 10) and worry (item 19), which have been perceived as being so related as to become repetitive.