Pproaches to diabetes self-management of multi-ethnic rural older adults in the: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Version vom 27. Februar 2018, 11:12 Uhr

27. Attride-Stirling J: Amphlet contained what had been allegedly letters exchanged amongst Mary and Cranstoun Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative study. Qual Res 2001, 1(three):385?05. 28. Charmaz K: Identity dilemma of chronically Ill Guys. Sociol Q 1994, 35(2):269?88. J Natl Med Assoc 2007, 99(5):550?58. 30. Gucciardi E, Smith PL, DeMelo M: Use of diabetes resources in adults attending a self-management education program. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 64(1?):322?30. 31. Cagle CS, Appel S, Skelly AH, Carter-Edwards L: Mid-life African-American females with kind two diabetes: influence on function as well as the multicaregiver part. Ethn Dis 2002, 12(four):555?66. 32. Asbring P: Chronic illness ?a disruption in life: identity-transformation amongst women with chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. J Adv Nurs 2001, 34(3):312?19. 33. Koch T, Kralik D, Taylor J: Males living with diabetes: minimizing the intrusiveness on the illness. J Clin Nurs 2000, 9(2):247?54. 34. Antonucci T, Akiyama H: An examination of Sex differences in social help amongst older Males and females. Sex Roles 1987, 17(11?two):737?49. 35. Spenceley SM, Williams BA: Self-care from the point of view of folks living with diabetes. Can J Nurs Res 2006, 38(3):124?45. 36. Dixey R: Gender perspectives on food and cooking abilities. British Food J 1996, 98(10):35?1. 37. Polivy J: Psychological consequences of food restriction. J Am Diet program Assoc 1996, 96(six):589?92.doi:10.1186/1471-2296-13-122 Cite this article as: Mathew et al.: Self-management experiences amongst males and ladies with kind two diabetes mellitus: a qualitative analysis. BMC Household Practice 2012 13:122.Submit your subsequent manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of:?Practical on the internet submission ?Thorough peer evaluation ?No space constraints or colour figure charges ?Quick publication on acceptance ?Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar ?Study that is freely accessible title= s12887-015-0481-x for redistributionSubmit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit Organizations are frequently characterized as complicated sociotechnical systems that call for effective coordinative and collaborative cognitive processes across folks and teams in order to meet their targets. As such, research in team cognition has develop into increasingly prevalent over the past decade. Team cognition can be a broad region of research meant to discover the manifestation of cognition inside the context of teamwork (Salas and Fiore, 2004; Letsky et al., 2008; Salas et al., 2012; Turner et al., 2014). This includes understanding how memory influences teams (e.g., transactive memoryFrontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2016 | Volume 7 | ArticleFiore and WiltshireExternal Group Cognitionsystems, Lewis and Herndon, 2011), or how cognitive Mall molecules might be developed to modulate either total MYPT1 or constructs, like mental models, can give explanatory worth to inform group functioning (e.g., title= acer.12126 shared mental title= j.adolescence.2013.ten.012 models, DeChurch and Mesmer-Magnus, 2010b). Other processes such as focus and decision generating, as they arise in teams, have also been studied [e.g., distributed cognition, Hutchins, 1995a; distributed situation awareness (DSA), Stanton, 2016]. A considerable volume of research on these topics has been able.Pproaches to diabetes self-management of multi-ethnic rural older adults at the extremes of glycemic manage.