Hters was made use of as the reference population. The standardized value was

95 self-assurance intervals (95 CI) of prevalence have been jir.2014.0227 calculated employing the mid-p test mainly because specific age groups experienced much less than 30 injury circumstances and we assumed the Poisson's distribution for the occurrence of injuries buy Citarinostat inside the order Imatinib (Mesylate) target population (11). The authors obtained written informed consent for participation inside the study.http://jkms.orgYoon J-H, et al. ?Workplace Injuries of FirefightersTable three. Causes of injuries in firefighters for the duration of past 12 months Causes of injuries No.* Fall, jump, slip Overexertion, strain Speak to with object Struck by an object Extreme weather Exposure to fire goods Exposure to chemical or radiation Automobile accident Other people Total 883 280 519 145 98 917 515 1,213 388 four,958 Total firefighters (n = 19,119) 17.eight five.6 10.five two.9 two.0 18.5 10.4 24.5 7.eight one hundred.0 four.6 1.5 2.7 0.8 0.5 four.eight two.7 6.three two.0 25.9 No.* 488 135 316 98 53 524 351 608 182 two,755 Fire suppression (n = 10,127) 17.7 4.9 11.five 3.six 1.9 19.0 12.7 22.1 six.6 100.0 four.8 1.3 3.1 1.0 0.5 5.2 3.five six.0 1.8 27.two Emergency health-related service (n = 4,850) No.* 292 107 145 31 33 278 105 495 148 1,634 17.9 six.5 eight.9 1.9 two.0 17.0 6.4 30.3 9.1 one hundred.0 6.0 2.two 3.0 0.six 0.7 five.7 two.two ten.2 three.1 33.7 No.* 103 38 58 16 12 115 59 110 58 569 Officer (n = four,142) 18.1 six.7 10.two two.eight 2.1 20.two ten.four 19.three 10.2 100.0 2.5 0.9 1.4 0.4 0.3 two.8 1.four 2.7 1.4 13.*All natures of several causes were counted for quantity and percent of prevalence; proportion of injuries; proportion of workers. Table four.Hters was made use of because the reference population. The standardized value was multiplied by 1,000 to represent the prevalence or quantity per one thousand workers through the past 12 months. 95 self-assurance intervals (95 CI) of prevalence had been jir.2014.0227 calculated making use of the mid-p test because specific age groups skilled less than 30 injury situations and we assumed the Poisson's distribution for the occurrence of injuries in the target population (11). The P values and P values for trend had been calculated with the 2 test plus the Cochran-Armitage trend test, respectively. We applied a several logistic regression model to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95 self-confidence intervals for each and every injury parameters with officers as the reference group. Age, marital status, smoking habit and profession periods were applied as confounding variables in the numerous logistic regression model, because those variables show important differences based on the presence or absence of injury experiences (Fig. 1). All P values beneath 0.05 were regarded as statistically considerable.