S their "external memory aids" (Wegner, 1987). Such specialization reduces the know-how

Author manuscript; readily available in PMC 2015 January 01.Lungeanu et al.PagePrior collaboration encounter has, in reality, been discovered to enhance the productivity of scientific collaboration (Abbasi, Altmann, Hossain, 2011; Stipelman et al., 2010).NIH-PA Author PF-670462 web Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript3.1 ContextSince interdisciplinary teams are defined as "linkages in between specialties of diverse topic matter" (Garfield, Malin, Tiny, 1978, p. This presents title= 1753-2000-7-28 an opportunity to advance our understanding with the consequences of group assembly on performance. Within this section we posit why prior experience, specifically co-authoring a paper or citing one yet another will influence the good results of interdisciplinary teams. two.2.1 Co-authorship relation--We expect that prior encounter of group members operating collectively will positively impact title= 1477-7800-4-29 the accomplishment of interdisciplinary scientific collaboration. By working with each other in the past, team members adapt to one another which eases communication (Katz, 1982). Teams with prior practical experience have normally established effective communication processes to use member diversity far more properly (Harrison, Value, Bell, 1998; Harrison, Price, Gavin, Florey, 2002), and are as a result a lot more probably to attain inventive ambitions (Gilson, Mathieu, Shalley, Ruddy, 2005; Taylor Greve, 2006).J Informetr. Author manuscript; readily available in PMC 2015 January 01.Lungeanu et al.PagePrior collaboration encounter has, the truth is, been discovered to increase the productivity of scientific collaboration (Abbasi, Altmann, Hossain, 2011; Stipelman et al., 2010).NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript3.1 ContextSince interdisciplinary teams are defined as "linkages amongst specialties of diverse topic matter" (Garfield, Malin, Little, 1978, p. 189), they will need to possess good communication to be able to generate inventive and novel tips. The National Science Foundation (NSF)'s statement on what's encouraged for investigation grant proposals is really telling: "NSF [...] encourages researchers to submit unsolicited interdisciplinary proposals for suggestions that happen to be in novel or emerging places extending beyond any unique present NSF program" (National Science Foundation, 2011). Provided prior findings suggesting that earlier collaboration might generate inventive outcomes and provided the NSF's guiding principle to fund proposals that are novel and creative, we propose: Hypothesis 7 Interdisciplinary teams exactly where members have co-authored with one particular yet another are much more title= ajim.22419 likely to be prosperous than teams where members have not co-authored.2.2.two Citation relation--Why researchers cite a single an additional has been previously studied across different scholarly domains. One particular framework proposes that researchers cite other people as a way to assistance their arguments. Nonetheless, how and why they do it differ. Specifically, the constructivist approach argues that citations are overwhelmingly focused on big-name peers with the goal to acquire credibility by association and persuade by means of rhetoric. The universalism strategy, argues that citations are made use of to provide credit for the usage of intellectual house. Recent studies brought further evidence towards the universalism strategy (White, 2004). Closely connected towards the universalism approach to citation making, a second framework suggests that people cite one another since of comparable investigation techniques or prevalent theoretical perspectives (Baldi, 1998; Van Dalen Henkens, 2001). Thus, citation relations are much more relevant towards the authors' perform from an intellectual instead of a individual point of view.