Ts. Then, in 2012, scientists at Amgen, a drug enterprise primarily based in

(Poaceae, Pooideae, Poeae, Poinae) in Mexico: new records,re-evaluation of P. ruprechtii, and two new species, P. palmeri and P. wendtii. PhytoKeys 15: 1?04. doi: ten.3897/phyto keys.15.Abstract A revision and key towards the 23 species and eight subspecies of Poa (like Dissanthelium) identified to occur in Mexico is offered. All voucher specimens seen are cited for accepted taxa, except P. annua for which one Valsartan/sacubitril web particular voucher per state is provided. Taxa not previously known from, or poorly understood in, Mexico are discussed. Poa palmeri sp. nov. is endemic to forested slopes of the Sierra Madre Oriental, and we distinguished it from P. ruprechtii s.s., a species of central Mexico that's right here emended to involve P. sharpii (syn. nov.). Poa wendtii sp. nov. is described from the Sierra Santa Rosa in northern Coahuila. Poa tacanae is placed in synonymy in P. seleri. Poa gymnantha and P. occidentalis are newly reported for Mexico, and material historically identified as P. villaroelii are placed in P. chamaeclinos.Ts. Then, in 2012, scientists at Amgen, a drug business based in Thousand Oaks,2014 | Vol. 2 | Iss. 3 | e00273 Web page?2014 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of your American Physiological Society and also the Physiological Society. This can be an open access report below the terms with the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction title= genetics.115.182410 in any medium, offered the original work is correctly cited.EditorialCalifornia, title= journal.pone.0133807 reported their failure to replicate 89 of the findings from 53 landmark cancer papers." This has caught the attention of your well-liked press both inside the Economist (2013) and within the New York Occasions Sunday Overview (Chwe 2014); researchers are urged to confront our "biases." As scientists and authors need to we not welcome enhanced opportunities to contribute to the validation of critical information and findings? We at Physiological Reports would prefer to encourage our readership to consist of in their papers, exactly where germane, their experiences with replicating the findings of other people. Documenting within a sentence or two a good replication and possessing a extra nuanced discussion of negative findings will be of excellent use towards the readership. We count on the integrity of our authors to submit their confirmatory studies using the context of why the information is important, and negative findings within a constructive andcritical format that would engender wholesome scientific dialog. That should definitely meet our objective of offering "a platform for all physiological research whose publication might be of benefit for the neighborhood." We welcome your feedback. PhytoKeys 15: 1?04 (2012) www.phytokeys.comA peer-reviewed open-access journaldoi: 10.3897/phytokeys.15.Revision of Poa L. (Poaceae, Pooideae, Poeae, Poinae) in Mexico: ...MONOGRAPHLaunched to accelerate biodiversity researchRevision of Poa L. (Poaceae, Pooideae, Poeae, Poinae) in Mexico: new records, re-evaluation of P. ruprechtii, and two new species, P. palmeri and P. wendtiiRobert J. Soreng1, Paul M. Peterson1 Department of Botany, National Museum of All-natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC, 20013-7012, USACorresponding author: Robert J. Soreng (sorengr@si.edu)Academic editor: Leonardo Versieux | Received 14 March 2012 | Accepted 20 July 2012 | Published 6 August 2012 Citation: Soreng RJ, Peterson PM (2012) Revision of Poa L.