Ul symbols ?which include religion ?that influence and organize subsequent interactions.

The analytic method we adopt makes use of Ulation from which a person patient comes, a predicted distribution of revolutionary new social network analysis models (Snijders, Steglich, and Schweinberger 2007; Steglich, Snijders, and Pearson 2010) that decompose social selection and socialization processes straight. Social selection reflects changes in social networks that outcome from the religious similarity among actual and potential friends, and socialization reflects religious alterations in persons as a function of friends' religion (Kandel 1978; Friedkin 1998). We use information from 7?2th grade adolescents from seven tiny K-12th grade schools where friendship networks have been collected over time for you to assess whether or not religion is uniquely friendship-inducing, a friend-based socializing element, or if both processes are jointly operative. We develop upon this analysis by quantifying the relative contributions of each for the network-religion autocorrelation, whilst also assessing whether or not the selection/ socialization final results derive from extra structural network and background variables. 1.1. Religious Individualism in Adolescence Individualistic narratives are very widespread in modern society, as Bellah and his coauthors' outlined in their influential book, Habits of the Heart (1985). The account they present describes the contemporary American preoccupation with "individual agency" (Bellah 1998), even amongst standard churchgoers (Madsen 2009; Wuthnow 1998). InSoc Sci Res. Author manuscript; readily available in PMC 2013 September 01.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptCheadle and SchwadelPageparticular, American youth are thought to become extremely individualistic in their religious beliefs and As lacking in life. This s10803-012-1616-7 was an practically universal theme among activities (Arnett and Jensen 2002). Smith and Denton (2005:233) summarize the modern adolescent preoccupation with individualism: ...almost all American teenagers believe that they're not influenced by something at all, religious or otherwise. Like many of the adults who've socialized them, teenagers take for granted an image of themselves as autonomous and self-defining people fully responsible title= 2013/480630 for and capable in the formation of their own lives. Lots of teenagers actually bristle in the suggestion that they are straight influenced by individuals and institutions outside of themselves. It really is during adolescence ?when Americans are apparently most resistant for the title= mnras/stv1634 idea that they're social beings, even even though paradoxically entering what is normally essentially the most intensely social phase of their lives (Carstensen 1992; Hartup and Stevens 1997) ?that we examine the social nature of religion. Throughout adolescence youth expand the time they devote socializing with peers as they seek to forge their very own futures (Brown 1990). They interact with each other in different settings in and out of school, at church, youth groups, through sporting events, parties, and so on., and so come to create histories with each other that form and reform friendship networks, socializing one another title= cddis.2015.241 in the process (Hartup and Stevens 1999; Rubin, Bukowski, and Parke 2006). Though analysis on adolescent social networks tends to focus on risky behaviors and delinquency (e.g., Haynie 2001), late adolescence is actually a time of substantial religious (Uecker, Regnerus, and Vaaler 2007) and friendship alter (Giordano 2003; Crosnoe, Frank, and Mueller 2008), producing this period, especially when combined together with the powerful social and interactional foci offered jointly by college and church (e.g.Ul symbols ?for example religion ?that influence and organize subsequent interactions.