Eable size without losing essential information through an orthogonal design (when: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus KletterWiki
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
[unmarkierte Version][unmarkierte Version]
K
K
 
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
−
[https://www.medchemexpress.com/CX-4945.html Silmitasertib price] Linguistically, the questions were adapted in the questionnaire for physicians from a self-assessment: "What would you choose ...?" into a judgment: "How do you think your patients would rate" and "What would your patient choose?".Statistical analysisThe Discrete Choice Experiment is a choice based method, and a variant of the conjoint analysis that was made possible through the theoretical work of Lancaster [16] and McFadden [17]. The treatment alternatives are presented to the subject and the subject has to decide for one of the presentedFor statistical data analysis we used analysis of variance, regression analysis, factor analysis, and random effect logit models for the DCE. All statistical analyses were done using SPSS and STATA. A p-value [https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jir.2014.0026 title= jir.2014.0026] results will be produced "by chance", they [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep39151 title= srep39151] are however artefacts (approx. 10 of such results must be expected at a 95  confidence level). A possible increase of significance level (e.g. Bonferroni correction) may minimize these errors but increases the risk of ignoring really existing relationships. Therefore, a significance level of p
+
Linguistically, the questions were adapted in the questionnaire for physicians from a self-assessment: "What would you choose ...?" into a judgment: "How do you think your patients would rate" and "What would your patient choose?".Statistical analysisThe Discrete Choice Experiment is a choice based method, and a variant of the conjoint analysis that was made possible through the theoretical work of Lancaster [16] and [https://www.medchemexpress.com/CUDC-427.html CUDC-427 site] McFadden [17]. However, the problem of multiple testing has to be borne in mind: with more than 200 statistical tests to be performed some significant [https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jir.2014.0026 title= jir.2014.0026] results will be produced "by chance", they [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep39151 title= srep39151] are however artefacts (approx. 10 of such results must be expected at a 95  confidence level). A possible increase of significance level (e.g. Bonferroni correction) may minimize these errors but increases the risk of [https://www.medchemexpress.com/CUDC-907.html CUDC-907 biological activity] ignoring really existing relationships. Therefore, a significance level of p

Aktuelle Version vom 5. Januar 2018, 04:05 Uhr

Linguistically, the questions were adapted in the questionnaire for physicians from a self-assessment: "What would you choose ...?" into a judgment: "How do you think your patients would rate" and "What would your patient choose?".Statistical analysisThe Discrete Choice Experiment is a choice based method, and a variant of the conjoint analysis that was made possible through the theoretical work of Lancaster [16] and CUDC-427 site McFadden [17]. However, the problem of multiple testing has to be borne in mind: with more than 200 statistical tests to be performed some significant title= jir.2014.0026 results will be produced "by chance", they title= srep39151 are however artefacts (approx. 10 of such results must be expected at a 95 confidence level). A possible increase of significance level (e.g. Bonferroni correction) may minimize these errors but increases the risk of CUDC-907 biological activity ignoring really existing relationships. Therefore, a significance level of p

Von „http://www.kletterwiki.de/index.php?title=Eable_size_without_losing_essential_information_through_an_orthogonal_design_(when&oldid=342998“